These two get shortlisted together because a founder who needs a logo will try both in the same afternoon, and both will produce something usable in ten minutes. On features they are not close: Canva is a far larger and better design tool, and it wins most of the rows on this page.
It is still the wrong choice for some people, and the reason is a single question. Can the logo ever become a mark you own exclusively? Design.com's answer is yes, for $145 on top of its subscription, at which point the design is pulled from sale and the intellectual property transfers to you. Canva's answer is a documented no: its help centre states that a logo made from Canva templates or stock elements is non-exclusive and cannot be registered as a trademark, and that Canva does not sell exclusive rights to a graphic at all, recommending a human designer instead.
So read the table below knowing that the row count does not settle this. Canva takes more rows and is still the wrong pick if you intend to register the mark, because no amount of template breadth substitutes for a licence you can file on.
What we tested: we ran Design.com's free generation flow in late 2025 while exploring directions for a client brand, which is the basis for what this page says about its brief intake and concept quality. We did not buy a logo, so nothing here reports on its paid download. Everything about Canva, and all licence and pricing detail on both sides, comes from each vendor's own published documentation, checked on 7 October 2026.