What we could not check
Neither vendor publishes an Enterprise price, and both put their most interesting capability there. Profound's nine-engine ceiling, its API and its single sign-on are all quote-only. Peec's 13-model ceiling and its single sign-on are the same, though its API starts on the published Pro plan. Any claim about the top of either product is a claim about a plan we cannot price, and we have not made one.
We also cannot independently verify either vendor's server-side measurement. Reading AI crawler and agent traffic from your own CDN or logs is a fundamentally stronger form of evidence than sampling answers, and we take it seriously for that reason, but attributing a given request to a given assistant is an inference. Ask what the margin of error is and how attribution works before you build reporting on it.
The country limit, checked in our own account
Peec's tier table caps countries per project at one on Starter and three above it, while its pricing FAQ says any supported country can be tracked at no additional cost because pricing follows prompts rather than regions. Those read as contradictory. They are not, and we had it wrong here until 24 August. Peec's own documentation settles it: location is set per prompt, and the plan limit caps how many distinct prompt locations you can configure per project without changing the price. So a second market consumes prompts from your allowance rather than adding a country fee, and on the $80 plan you cannot configure one at all. We checked our own Peec account, which reports a single country across every tracked brand.
Who should look at neither
If you want to know whether you are mentioned at all and the budget is tight, Otterly.AI starts at $29 and answers that question. If AI visibility has become a board-level concern with procurement attached, the shortlist is Profound Enterprise against Scrunch AI and Conductor, and Peec's self-serve tiers are not the comparison. Our best AEO tools ranking covers all twelve.