AI search analytics for marketing teams, tracking brand visibility, position and sentiment across answer engines.
TL;DR verdict
The cheapest daily tracker we assessed that we would actually recommend, and the only one letting you pull data out from the bottom tier. Price it on the models you genuinely need though, and check which markets your plan covers before committing.
Peec AI tracks how answer engines talk about your brand: whether you appear, where you sit in the answer, and how you are characterised when you do. It refreshes daily on every plan and reports competitors alongside you. It is built for in-house marketing teams and agencies watching one or two markets closely, and it takes an unusual position on seats, putting an unlimited number of people on every tier including the cheapest.
The capabilities it ships, and which of them stand out.
Standout features
What the product does not do, kept separate from what we could not establish.
Product limitations
Could not verify
Teams who want the numbers visible to everyone
Uncapped seats mean a whole department can log in without changing the bill, which is unusual enough here to be a deciding factor for a larger team on a small budget.
Anyone tracking one market intensively
Refreshing every day on a single country is the shape of this product, and at $80 nothing else we found does it as cheaply.
Teams with their own tooling
Pulling data into an internal dashboard does not require an upgrade or a sales call, which is unusual at this end of the market.
Businesses selling into several countries
The $80 plan can configure a single prompt location, so a business selling into two markets starts at Pro rather than Starter.
Anyone who needs all six models
The extras needed to complete the set cost about as much again, so the figure on the card describes a configuration you may not want.
Teams building a reporting pipeline
Both a documented interface and federated login sit on the unpriced tier, so the work cannot be scoped against a published number.
From $80/mo billed annually ($95 monthly). Pro $205 ($245), Advanced $420 ($495), Enterprise quoted. Three of six models included at every self-serve tier; extra models $30–$140/mo each. Checked 14 August 2026.
| Plan | Published price | What the tier includes |
|---|---|---|
| Starter | $80/mo annual · $95 monthly |
|
| Pro | $205/mo annual · $245 monthly |
|
| Advanced | $420/mo annual · $495 monthly |
|
| Enterprise | Custom |
|
Pricing watchouts
What Peec AI connects to, and what it commits to in writing.
Integrations
Support
Chat on every tier, email from Pro, a Slack community on all tiers and custom onboarding from Advanced. Enterprise adds dedicated support. No response-time commitment is published at any tier. Checked 14 August 2026.
Answer engines are unstable in a way search results are not. The same question asked twice in a week can produce materially different responses, because models are updated, retrieval changes and the sources being drawn on move. A weekly reading in that environment is close to noise: you cannot tell a real shift from the variance you happened to sample.
Refreshing every day on every plan is therefore a more substantial decision than it looks on a feature list. It is the difference between a number you can plot and a number you can only quote. Several rivals treat daily sampling as an upgrade, which quietly makes their cheaper tiers much weaker than the comparison suggests.
The headline figure buys three of six models. That is not hidden and the arithmetic is published, but it is the single most important thing to work out before comparing this against anything else, because completing the set roughly doubles the bill at every level. A shortlist built on advertised entry prices will place this far higher than a shortlist built on the configuration you would actually run.
Which three you need is a real question rather than a formality. If your buyers use ChatGPT and Perplexity and nothing else matters, the included set is probably fine and this is very good value. If you need broad coverage, price the full configuration and compare that. We have not run this on a live account, so the capability reading here comes from published specification rather than from output we have seen.
Where another tool in the category fits a reader better.
Choose this if you sell into more than one market. Country limits disappear above its entry plan, and analytics and programmatic access both arrive at a published price.
Read reviewChoose this if you want a lower floor with every add-on priced, and can accept a smaller prompt allowance to get there.
Read reviewChoose this if procurement is involved: broader coverage, edge connections and the only published response commitment on our ranking.
Read reviewAimed at what the public site cannot settle.
Three self-serve tiers at $80, $205 and $420 a month billed annually, or $95, $245 and $495 monthly, plus a quoted Enterprise plan. Add-on model pricing is published on the same page. Checked 14 August 2026.
Three of the six on every self-serve tier, with the rest available as add-ons at $30 to $140 a month each depending on plan. Enterprise reaches up to eleven. Budget for what you need rather than what is bundled.
Only on Enterprise, which carries no published price, and the same applies to single sign-on. An MCP server is available throughout the self-serve range, so there is a route to your own tooling below Enterprise, just not a documented API.
One country on the entry plan, three on the two tiers above, unlimited on Enterprise. The limit caps how many distinct prompt locations a project can configure and carries no separate charge, so a second market costs prompts from your allowance rather than a country fee.
Unlimited, on every tier including the cheapest. Seats are not metered at all, which materially changes the comparison against rivals that charge per person or cap the entry plan at three.
From the vendor's own published pages, read at source on 14 August 2026, and scored against the five review criteria. We have not used the product, so ease of use is left unscored rather than estimated.
Buy this if daily tracking on your three most important models covers the market you sell into, and you can work without a published interface spec. At $80 with uncapped seats it is the cheapest credible daily tracker we found, and an agent interface at the bottom of the range is something no rival offers. Two things to settle first. Price the configuration you would genuinely run, not the one included. And get the country entitlement written into the contract, because the public pages give two different answers.
Visit Peec AIUpdated August 2026
Research-based. Everything here comes from the vendor’s own published pages and verified third-party sources, read on the date below. Where we report a claim we could not check, the review says so. How we rank
| Criterion | Weight | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Core capabilityHow well it does the job it exists for. | 30% | 7/10 |
| Value and real costWhat you actually pay, and whether you can find that out before you buy. | 25% | 9/10 |
| Ease of useSetup, day-to-day use and how long it takes to get something useful. Only scored when we have used it. | 20% | Not scored |
| Integrations and extensibilityWhat it connects to, and whether your data can come back out. | 15% | 6/10 |
| Support and documentationWhat is committed to in writing, and what you can read without a sales call. | 10% | 6/10 |
Rewritten to the rebuilt review format and rescored against the five review criteria rather than inheriting the AEO ranking score. The rating is unchanged at 3.5 and the scores behind it now publish on the page.
We got this wrong and corrected it. The version published on 12 August stated that Peec AI publishes no price at any tier, rating it 2.0. That was false: all three self-serve tiers were published on both billing cycles, with add-on pricing, and had been at the time we checked. The figures render client-side and our check read the raw markup. Rescored: real cost 1 to 9, support 4 to 6, and integrations 6 after crediting the MCP server on every tier while correcting a tier-blind reading of the API. Rating moved from 2.0 to 3.5.
By Rajat Kapoor. SaaSInsight is funded by labelled placements and affiliate links. Some links may be paid — always labelled. Read our disclosure policy.
